A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Mainstreaming Mass Drug Administration for Schistosomiasis and Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis in Four Districts of Nigeria.

In Nigeria, mass drug administration (MDA) for schistosomiasis (SCH) and soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) has often been coordinated with other programs that receive greater external funding. As these programs reach stop MDA milestones, SCH and STH programs will likely need to transition implementation, or "mainstream," to domestic support. A mixed-methods study was conducted in four districts before (2021) and after (2022) mainstreaming to evaluate its impact on MDA coverage. Household surveys were done in 30 villages per district pre- and post-mainstreaming. All selected communities were eligible for STH treatment; around a third were eligible for SCH treatment. Mass drug administration was primarily conducted in schools. A total of 5,441 school-aged children were included in pre-mainstreaming and 5,789 were included in post-mainstreaming. Mass drug administration coverage was heterogeneous, but overall, mebendazole coverage declined nonsignificantly from 81% pre-mainstreaming to 76% post-mainstreaming (P = 0.09); praziquantel coverage declined significantly from 73% to 55% (P = 0.008). Coverage was significantly lower among unenrolled children or those reporting poor school attendance in nearly every survey. For the qualitative component, 173 interviews and 74 focus groups were conducted with diverse stakeholders. Respondents were deeply pessimistic about the future of MDA after mainstreaming and strongly supported a gradual transition to full government ownership. Participants formulated recommendations for effective mainstreaming: clear budget allocation by governments, robust and targeted training, trust building, and comprehensive advocacy. Although participants lacked confidence that SCH and STH programs could be sustained after reductions in external support, initial results indicate that MDA coverage can remain high 1 year into mainstreaming.

Is exposure to chemical pollutants associated with sleep outcomes? A systematic review.

Environmental exposures may influence sleep; however, the contributions of environmental chemical pollutants to sleep health have not been systematically investigated. We conducted a systematic review to identify, evaluate, summarize, and synthesize the existing evidence between chemical pollutants (air pollution, exposures related to the Gulf War and other conflicts, endocrine disruptors, metals, pesticides, solvents) and dimensions of sleep health (architecture, duration, quality, timing) and disorders (sleeping pill use, insomnia, sleep-disordered breathing)). Of the 204 included studies, results were mixed; however, the synthesized evidence suggested associations between particulate matter, exposures related to the Gulf War, dioxin and dioxin-like compounds, and pesticide exposure with worse sleep quality; exposures related to the Gulf War, aluminum, and mercury with insomnia and impaired sleep maintenance; and associations between tobacco smoke exposure with insomnia and sleep-disordered breathing, particularly in pediatric populations. Possible mechanisms relate to cholinergic signaling, neurotransmission, and inflammation. Chemical pollutants are likely key determinants of sleep health and disorders. Future studies should aim to evaluate environmental exposures on sleep across the lifespan, with a particular focus on developmental windows and biological mechanisms, as well as in historically marginalized or excluded populations.